I just can’t get on board with the idea that humanity is getting worse. What makes people think that it was ever significantly better overall? I know that sounds rather rhetorical but I am actually interested in the answer.
There are some things that tempt me towards the ‘everything’s going downhill’ pov, notably areas of British life that have changed dramatically either post WW2 or post industrial revolution (can’t decide which was more pivotal right now – perhaps neither!):
• Technology• Communication/Media
• Family life
• Food
There are probably more but these leap out at me.
Technology and Communication/Media, I presume, are more advanced than they have ever been before. However, that is clearly not a bad thing all round. The now hackneyed charge that all the new types of communication are destroying real relationships doesn’t hold much water for me. Without exception email, Facebook, MySpace, msn, texts, blogging…have enhanced my relationships with others. Including my family. Perhaps that’s just me. More serious, perhaps, is the way that modern technology etc. has sped up the pace of life. But is that really the case? All (I can’t think of any exceptions) my friends who have lived for some amount of time in Australia or South Africa say that the pace of life there is so much more relaxed and yet they have access to the same technology in those countries.
Oh, there is so much more to say about my first two bullet points (a little taster: freedom of speech, photography, propaganda, hyperreality, charities, medical technology, the Hippocratic oath, image manipulation, transport, pollution, weapons…), particularly about the press . However, nothing that I think of really convinces me that humanity is being damaged by these in a way that we have never been damaged before.
That’s really the same for the state of family life and food (in modern-day
Is the problem facing humanity, in fact, simply that there are so many more of us living on an elderly globe? There are more people doing the same amount of wrong things and it’s too hard (as it always has been) for most people, most of the time to step away from the glory of wealth, the pleasure of a quiet life, the horror of suffering or the temptations of what is just out of reach… to take the long view and act. Earth may be slowly (or quickly) dying but compare its rulers, children, youth, parents, teachers, managers, writers, role models, wealthy, poor, etc. to their equivalents in times gone by and I’m not sure there’ll be much in it.
And yet, we’re still here. Somehow, people manage to scrape away the dirt and find love, dreams, talents, pleasure and hope. That is a sign that humanity hasn't gone down the drain with a final glug. This is too. Whatever rises above the rest.
5 comments:
Very good. Much better than my feeble attempts.
Although I will say that perhaps the technology that enhances your relationships does so because you already learnt different ways to interact? For a generation exposed to these easier(?) ways of relating maybe this could lead to a stunting of interpersonal skills that ideally should be learnt face to face.
Maybe I'm just an old duffer.
I've been pondering the role of the media in our society recently, and as much as I love freedom of speech and free press, I wonder if some of the sensationalist journalism in some quarters actually perpetuates and blows some issues out of all proportions.
Slight tangent I know. But is there such a thing as TOO much information? Or rather, information that isn't of a good enough quality? Are we so consumed with wanting news and gossip, some of the basic facts get twisted, ignored or overlooked?
And yes, Toby is an old duffer. And its a pure lie of filth that I'm turning 30 next year...
The problem with the media as I see it is that it is not free, the press is not free because there is a very definite agenda going on, especially considering the massive amount of outlets owned by massively few people, ie Murdoch etc. We are therefore being dumbed down in the sense that we are not addressing the issues that need addressing because we are not being made aware of them. If you take an issue about which you know a lot and then examine how the press treat that issue (or if they treat it at all) you become immediately aware of how people are being misled. We are largely becoming depoliticised, people are losing the ability to think for themselves because they're more interested in sport or the x factor. This allows corrupt politicians to do what they want without being interrupted.
But I think this has happened at different points throughout history - it hasn't only happened now.
True, but it doesn't make it acceptable because it keeps happening. That just means we haven't progressed at all. Our press is nevertheless not free. For instance yesterday an ex head of MI6 (who admitted "intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy" of invading Iraq)
a. gave a talk at the LSE
and b. was (eventually) pursued from the building by protesters whose questions he refused to answer.
a. was reported
b. was not
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0gk9sABtJxM
Maybe it's just me!
Post a Comment